Postby Bibliomike » Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:31 pm
"Miri" was probably banned because Kirk is flirting with an 18 year old. (Well, ok, she's really like centuries old, but to outward appearances...)
Doesn't Marta get blown up off-screen? Been a while since I've watched it, but, c'mon, it was 1968... how much are they gonna show onscreen?
Was the announcer for the "Arsenal of Freedom" trailer a different guy than usual? Not the usual "STAAAAAR trek" inflection! He's back for "Symbiosis" (and thus all is right with the world).
I may be wrong, but I think this is the last time the saucer is separated, ever, until "Generations." Am I forgetting something? (Probably.) I know it's only the second time it was done (although it may have been threatened on other occasions), so I get what you're saying, Scott, regarding it "getting tired by this point" -- it is all recycled footage, as you point out -- but, to be fair, it was only the second time it was shown.
I was surprised neither of you mentioned the scene between Picard and Crusher (except to compare her to Dr. Zaius -- Really, Chris?) underground. Again, haven't seen it in a while, but I remember it as a fairly touching and interesting scene, one of the few long-term character development beats TNG did in its early run, developing the awkward emotional relationship between the two characters. Gates McFadden especially plays that scene well.
I still like "Symbiosis" better than you two do, because I think all the guest actors do fairly good jobs. The first act is fairly comic -- how often do characters talk like real people in "Star Trek," after all? I love hearing Picard hail the freighter captain who responds, "Um, yeah, sure, if you think that'll help." It's a nice beat. Judson Scott is a little clumsy and wooden throughout but, somehow, it works with his character. I do agree the Nancy Reagan-esque "Don't Do Drugs" scene is very lame and very 80s and has not aged well, but, to her credit, Denise Crosby does about as much with it as anyone possibly could; and, as Chris suggests, it does organically fit her character's background, because surely drug abuse would have been rampant on her failed colony world. And, sure, the invocation of the Prime Directive is way off-base, as it often was in early TNG. It went from becoming a reasonable rule against "contaminating" still-developing cultures to a convenient excuse for Starfleet to avoid messy entangelments, even when the Federation's ideals clearly call for intervention (as here, as Chris argues). Still, for a kid who'd been a fan when only TOS was around, I don't think the Prime Directive is mentioned in any of the TOS theatrical films, so it made a really nice call-back to TOS days. It even made me start (but abandon) a story in which Picard's involvement in Jack Crusher's death was revealed to be the result of some attempt to circumvent the Prime Directive, which I thought would explain Picard's obsessive clinging to it, and the awkwardness of that whole conversation in the 'lift with Crusher. I really liked Scott's explanation of why Crusher didn't recognize the addiction problem right away.
Not for nothin', but I don't think Picard's (granted, overly done) asking for his officers' opinions undermines his authority. It's not as though he doesn't have any ideas of his own; he's leading by giving space for discussion and possibly dissent before he makes his final decision. The buck still stops with him. Good leaders are open to hearing others' ideas and taking from them what is of value, so, good on Picard, I say. And Kirk did exactly the same thing in early TOS, too -- e.g., "Balance of Terror," even as late as "Return to Tomorrow" (... "Risk is our business!") -- so there's that.