Postby Bibliomike » Wed Sep 08, 2010 2:39 pm
Re: whether the "Long Time Ago" omnibus changes anything -- I don't know, but based on what you guys have been using as the intro to your reviews of the Marvel comics, didn't it used to say "Stan Lee Presents" in the banner instead of "Lucasfilm Presents"? (I also wouldn't be surprised if Lucasfilm brought some revisionist history pressure to bear on the "mistakes" copy on the back cover... and, to Dark Horse's credit, they did use those scare quotes around "mistakes," which could be read as a tacit acknowledgment that they weren't mistakes originally.)
I got this volume, too, based on how enthusiastic you guys are about these old issues -- but, sorry, these stories aren't for me. I had hoped I could read them with my son (just turned nine), but he seems to find them silly and uninteresting, and I'm afraid I'm forced to agree. On the other hand, we both really, really enjoyed the Al Williamson newspaper-turned-TPB three-volume set of stories. I was hoping these would be more like those -- but I guess these came a few years earlier, so maybe it was an unrealistic expectation. (And also, to be fair, I may be souring on media-licensed tie-in comics in general, so... it may not really be the fault of the book itself. I am giving the new "Knight Errant" series a try, mainly because that's an era of Star Wars history we don't have "official" movie or TV stuff to compare it to. But I've tried reading a few "Star Wars" novels now, and have been really discouraged -- I think "Star Wars" may work best on-screen, or, at the very least, visually. "Star Trek" seems different, although that may just be my personal bias!)
Chris, you're exactly right, that this episode is a prequel to the Clone Wars movie (as is "Cat and Mouse" from season 2). I am unsure why the creative team wants to do these out-of-sequence stories -- good episode and all, for all the reasons you guys stated, but why are they going to jump around in the narrative time frame? We'll see if they keep doing it, I guess, to see if there is a rhyme or reason to it...
We have gone Blu-Ray at our house -- and "Clone Wars," incidentally, is gorgeous in high def -- but I, too, am not whooped up about buying Star Wars for Blu-Ray. It will depend on how much extra material there is and what it is, because my player "upconverts" standard DVDs just fine, and I've got all the special editions. If there are several hours of original documentaries or something, though, I might be tempted (and provided I have a good discount coupon somewhere!)